Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9511 - 9520 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 9511 - 9520 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
colloquy defective. We affirm the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119176 - 2014-08-12
colloquy defective. We affirm the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119176 - 2014-08-12
Margaret Jane Kozlowicz v. Jeffrey David Schwartz
, brought a motion to enforce the divorce judgment. After taking additional testimony, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9386 - 2005-03-31
, brought a motion to enforce the divorce judgment. After taking additional testimony, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9386 - 2005-03-31
City of Madison v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
N.W.2d 841 (1980)(quoting Joint Sch. Dist. No. 10 v. Jefferson Educ. Ass'n, 78 Wis. 2d 94, 106, 253
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17485 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 841 (1980)(quoting Joint Sch. Dist. No. 10 v. Jefferson Educ. Ass'n, 78 Wis. 2d 94, 106, 253
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17485 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
)(quoting Joint Sch. Dist. No. 10 v. Jefferson Educ. Ass'n, 78 Wis. 2d 94, 106, 253 N.W.2d 536 (1977
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17485 - 2017-09-21
)(quoting Joint Sch. Dist. No. 10 v. Jefferson Educ. Ass'n, 78 Wis. 2d 94, 106, 253 N.W.2d 536 (1977
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17485 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
or Amanda Bryan[].” ¶5 In October 2010, Jensen filed contempt motions against Keopple.[4] Jensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92876 - 2013-02-17
or Amanda Bryan[].” ¶5 In October 2010, Jensen filed contempt motions against Keopple.[4] Jensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92876 - 2013-02-17
State v. Steven M. Kuenzi
contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats. He contends the trial court erred in denying a motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13759 - 2005-03-31
contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats. He contends the trial court erred in denying a motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13759 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The circuit court then adjourned the matter for sentencing. Stroik next filed a pro se motion seeking
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231140 - 2018-12-18
. The circuit court then adjourned the matter for sentencing. Stroik next filed a pro se motion seeking
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231140 - 2018-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 20, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
of extended supervision. She has also appealed from an order denying her motion for resentencing or sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27410 - 2006-12-19
of extended supervision. She has also appealed from an order denying her motion for resentencing or sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27410 - 2006-12-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
In October 2010, Jensen filed contempt motions against Keopple.4 Jensen averred that contrary to the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92876 - 2014-09-15
In October 2010, Jensen filed contempt motions against Keopple.4 Jensen averred that contrary to the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92876 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
an order denying her motion for resentencing or sentence modification. We affirm the judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27410 - 2014-09-15
an order denying her motion for resentencing or sentence modification. We affirm the judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27410 - 2014-09-15