Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9511 - 9520 of 63537 for records.
Search results 9511 - 9520 of 63537 for records.
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132592 - 2015-01-12
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132592 - 2015-01-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215264 - 2018-07-11
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215264 - 2018-07-11
Ellen M. Rhode v. Dennis E. Rhode
and will not be upset on appeal if the decision reflects a rational mental process by which the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8658 - 2005-03-31
and will not be upset on appeal if the decision reflects a rational mental process by which the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8658 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417992 - 2021-09-01
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417992 - 2021-09-01
COURT OF APPEALS
that is not supported by the evidentiary record. We reject Carl’s argument and affirm the judgment. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31141 - 2007-12-10
that is not supported by the evidentiary record. We reject Carl’s argument and affirm the judgment. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31141 - 2007-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon consideration of the no-merit reports and an independent review of the records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307476 - 2020-11-25
not filed a response. Upon consideration of the no-merit reports and an independent review of the records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307476 - 2020-11-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2017AP2403-NM 2 for A.B. 2 A.B. has not responded. 3 Upon an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212350 - 2018-05-09
. No. 2017AP2403-NM 2 for A.B. 2 A.B. has not responded. 3 Upon an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212350 - 2018-05-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206751 - 2018-01-10
has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206751 - 2018-01-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, 1 we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113461 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, 1 we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113461 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
conviction. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99511 - 2014-09-15
conviction. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99511 - 2014-09-15