Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9521 - 9530 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
Search results 9521 - 9530 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
Laura E.B. v. Robert M.C.
on the evidence it heard, the court found a de facto 45% (Robert) ‑ 55% (Laura) shared-time split. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12762 - 2005-03-31
on the evidence it heard, the court found a de facto 45% (Robert) ‑ 55% (Laura) shared-time split. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12762 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
determines whether that new factor justifies modification of the sentence.” Id., ¶ 37. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974172 - 2025-06-25
determines whether that new factor justifies modification of the sentence.” Id., ¶ 37. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974172 - 2025-06-25
Ammann and Whitney, Inc. v. Thomas Roskos
. This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Burkes v. Klauser, 185 Wis.2d 309, 327, 517 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7945 - 2005-03-31
. This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Burkes v. Klauser, 185 Wis.2d 309, 327, 517 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7945 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous standard. Id. Second, we review de novo the application of those historical facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88748 - 2014-09-15
erroneous standard. Id. Second, we review de novo the application of those historical facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88748 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶3 Appellate review of the constitutionality of a statute is de novo. State v. Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93170 - 2014-09-15
). STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶3 Appellate review of the constitutionality of a statute is de novo. State v. Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93170 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decides de novo. See id. DISCUSSION ¶12 A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel has two parts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81209 - 2014-09-15
decides de novo. See id. DISCUSSION ¶12 A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel has two parts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81209 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mark R. Voss v. Sentry Insurance
involves construction of an insurance policy, we review the trial court’s decision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11246 - 2017-09-19
involves construction of an insurance policy, we review the trial court’s decision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11246 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael C. Yates
an individual has been placed in jeopardy twice for the same offense is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14976 - 2017-09-21
an individual has been placed in jeopardy twice for the same offense is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14976 - 2017-09-21
Fox City Scale, Inc. v. Badger Scale, Inc.
in a lawsuit is a question of law we review de novo. See Elliott v. Donahue, 169 Wis.2d 310, 316, 485 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12126 - 2005-03-31
in a lawsuit is a question of law we review de novo. See Elliott v. Donahue, 169 Wis.2d 310, 316, 485 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12126 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, Wis. Stat. § 980.031, which is a question of law that we review de novo. See Kamps v. DOR, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85185 - 2012-07-24
, Wis. Stat. § 980.031, which is a question of law that we review de novo. See Kamps v. DOR, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85185 - 2012-07-24