Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9521 - 9530 of 29429 for er.

Ronald Nortman v. Mark J. Roou
is whether the trial court erred by distributing all of the available proceeds under the distribution formula
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5579 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. LaPonzo Monroe Dallas
. He argues that the circuit court erred when it denied his motions to compel the production
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19523 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
for relief by claiming lack of a hearing.[2] ¶4 Lacy also asserts the court erred in refusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54344 - 2010-09-13

[PDF] State v. Glenn Van Remmen
of an intoxicant (OWI). He argues that the trial court erred in sentencing him as a repeat offender. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12481 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Patrick DeMauro v. Peter R. Szukis
claims the trial court erred in concluding the parties orally entered into an accord and satisfaction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12434 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and protective placement in a locked setting. The no-merit report addresses whether the circuit court erred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962535 - 2025-05-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to argue that the court erred in deciding that its decision would not have been different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027136 - 2025-10-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and applying it to the facts of this case, we conclude that the circuit court erred in granting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133743 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] James Ferron v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
the Ferrons “had no alternative but to vigorously defend.” DOT argues that the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11339 - 2017-09-19

State v. Robert F. Karl
that the court erred in sentencing Karl. The maximum possible sentence was forty years in prison. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12279 - 2005-03-31