Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9521 - 9530 of 12879 for se.
Search results 9521 - 9530 of 12879 for se.
State v. Gerold A. Haut
motion, pro se, arguing ineffectiveness of appellate counsel. The circuit court denied his motion. Haut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7449 - 2005-03-31
motion, pro se, arguing ineffectiveness of appellate counsel. The circuit court denied his motion. Haut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7449 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ritchie H. Dumer
proceeded pro se, he has done so competently and presented cogent arguments for our consideration. We have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7721 - 2005-03-31
proceeded pro se, he has done so competently and presented cogent arguments for our consideration. We have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7721 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Elaine A. Ray v. Town of Kinnickinnic
her objections to the order. This argument is unavailing. Pro se litigants, other than prisoners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7651 - 2017-09-19
her objections to the order. This argument is unavailing. Pro se litigants, other than prisoners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7651 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Sykes
stop per se or, pat down, which he had a right to do under the circumstances to obtain the identity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6460 - 2017-09-19
stop per se or, pat down, which he had a right to do under the circumstances to obtain the identity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6460 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Steven Osterman, pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319088 - 2020-12-29
. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Steven Osterman, pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319088 - 2020-12-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Marcus Singleton, pro se, appeals a circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=930272 - 2025-03-20
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Marcus Singleton, pro se, appeals a circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=930272 - 2025-03-20
State v. Gary J. Hazen
Hazen, appearing pro se, does not directly challenge the denial of his motion to withdraw his pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2770 - 2013-03-31
Hazen, appearing pro se, does not directly challenge the denial of his motion to withdraw his pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2770 - 2013-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
), and resisting an officer, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 946.41(1).[2] Nowak, pro se, brought a motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64150 - 2015-02-10
), and resisting an officer, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 946.41(1).[2] Nowak, pro se, brought a motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64150 - 2015-02-10
COURT OF APPEALS
circumstances.” Id. “As with lawyers, a pro se litigant is required to make a reasonable investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48807 - 2010-04-07
circumstances.” Id. “As with lawyers, a pro se litigant is required to make a reasonable investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48807 - 2010-04-07
COURT OF APPEALS
Constitutions, a warrantless search is per se unreasonable, and evidence derived from it will be suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41493 - 2009-09-29
Constitutions, a warrantless search is per se unreasonable, and evidence derived from it will be suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41493 - 2009-09-29