Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9531 - 9540 of 40260 for probate forms/1000.
Search results 9531 - 9540 of 40260 for probate forms/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
a probation revocation hearing based upon newly discovered evidence. For the reasons discussed below, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55744 - 2010-10-20
a probation revocation hearing based upon newly discovered evidence. For the reasons discussed below, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55744 - 2010-10-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court limited cross-examination of Phiffer’s probation agent; (3) the evidence at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=879523 - 2024-11-21
court limited cross-examination of Phiffer’s probation agent; (3) the evidence at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=879523 - 2024-11-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to reopen a probation revocation hearing based upon newly discovered evidence. For the reasons discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55744 - 2014-09-15
to reopen a probation revocation hearing based upon newly discovered evidence. For the reasons discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55744 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Wisconsin Department of Corrections v. Robert B. Kliesmet
to detain alleged violators of probation or parole in the Milwaukee County Jail first became the subject
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17142 - 2017-09-21
to detain alleged violators of probation or parole in the Milwaukee County Jail first became the subject
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17142 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Comments on Supreme Court rule petition 18-01 - Hon. Randy R. Koschnick, Director of State Courts
court form, "Decision and Order for Contempt," is set up for a court commissioner's signature
/supreme/docs/1801koschnick.pdf - 2018-02-15
court form, "Decision and Order for Contempt," is set up for a court commissioner's signature
/supreme/docs/1801koschnick.pdf - 2018-02-15
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - February 2023
the conditions of his probation and extended supervision. While on probation for a previous battery
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=624171 - 2023-02-15
the conditions of his probation and extended supervision. While on probation for a previous battery
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=624171 - 2023-02-15
[PDF]
Wisconsin Supreme Court oral argument - February 2023
the conditions of his probation and extended supervision. While on probation for a previous battery
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsfeb2023.pdf - 2023-02-15
the conditions of his probation and extended supervision. While on probation for a previous battery
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsfeb2023.pdf - 2023-02-15
[PDF]
State v. Lee A. Sutton
testimony that he was on probation. Prior to voir dire, the court inquired whether Sutton had any prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12802 - 2017-09-21
testimony that he was on probation. Prior to voir dire, the court inquired whether Sutton had any prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12802 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Aretus S. Fenn
¶4 Fenn’s defense included Elam’s testimony from Fenn’s probation revocation hearing, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13401 - 2017-09-21
¶4 Fenn’s defense included Elam’s testimony from Fenn’s probation revocation hearing, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13401 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Dahl to serve ten years’ probation consecutive to the sexual assault sentence. Denied presumptive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52368 - 2010-07-20
Dahl to serve ten years’ probation consecutive to the sexual assault sentence. Denied presumptive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52368 - 2010-07-20