Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9541 - 9550 of 51494 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.

[MS WORD] ME-908A: Settlement Agreement
treatment and conditions for the term of this Agreement: |_| A. Take all prescribed doses of psychotropic
/formdisplay/ME-908A.doc?formNumber=ME-908A&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2020-02-04

State v. Zena H.
, and that they continued to use illegal drugs, despite the frequent offers of drug counseling and drug treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15743 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - December 2011
No. 2. He sought treatment coverage from Cintas No. 2 through its health insurance provider. When
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74708 - 2014-09-15

State v. Floyd P.
, and that they continued to use illegal drugs, despite the frequent offers of drug counseling and drug treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15725 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Zena H.
illegal drugs, despite the frequent offers of drug counseling and drug treatment. Testimony also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15743 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
illness, treatment, or behavior related to this illness” would not be admissible at trial. In support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643518 - 2023-04-11

[PDF] State v. Floyd P.
illegal drugs, despite the frequent offers of drug counseling and drug treatment. Testimony also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15725 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Ronald A. Arthur
to practice law in Wisconsin, and recommending further that Arthur be required to pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17742 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Ronald A. Arthur
be required to pay the costs of this disciplinary proceeding, which are substantial. ¶2 Arthur challenges
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17742 - 2005-04-14

[PDF] Pamela D. v. Michael P.
. The State cross-appeals, also arguing that the child support order in effect at the time of the settlement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8341 - 2017-09-19