Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9541 - 9550 of 16506 for commenting.

[PDF] NOTICE
, “[a]t this time, I don’t have any comment.” No. 2008AP1858-CR 6 claims at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39274 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jacquelyn A. LoPiccolo
that her various comments to the effect that she wanted Johnson dead were only a figure of speech
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20008 - 2005-10-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
argument. And the prosecutor’s comments that the victim lost her innocence to Martin-Andrade were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252215 - 2020-01-14

[PDF] State v. Mario M. Martinez
comments during sentencing as well as his statement at the postconviction motion hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2751 - 2017-09-19

WI App 130 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1955-CR Complete Titl...
counsel reached this figure by multiplying thirty days per month by ten months. We do not comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70096 - 2011-09-27

State v. Lawrence P. Hoffman
reluctant to give requested theory of defense instructions so as to avoid the appearance of commenting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4483 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
commented that M.H. appeared to be “judge shopping,” and it denied the motions after determining
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050883 - 2025-12-18

[PDF] Wisconsin Oven Corporation v. Mesa Industries, Inc.
that the contractual rights are customarily used as commercial security. See Official Comment, 3 UNIFORM COMMERCIAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15697 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
on Zuniga’s dicta in which we commented that Windom does not “permit[] a prosecutor to unilaterally retreat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32277 - 2014-09-15

Lindsay Mosher v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
by the defense to warrant introducing this testimony on rebuttal. We see no error in the court’s comments.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15114 - 2005-03-31