Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9541 - 9550 of 63529 for records.
Search results 9541 - 9550 of 63529 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.21(1). After our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108198 - 2017-09-21
809.21(1). After our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108198 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417992 - 2021-09-01
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417992 - 2021-09-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220312 - 2018-10-02
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220312 - 2018-10-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026920 - 2025-10-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026920 - 2025-10-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. After reviewing the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164060 - 2017-09-21
. After reviewing the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164060 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132592 - 2015-01-12
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132592 - 2015-01-12
State v. Paul L. George
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that any further appellate proceedings would lack arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10506 - 2005-03-31
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that any further appellate proceedings would lack arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10506 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134438 - 2015-02-02
, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134438 - 2015-02-02
[PDF]
Eugene Cherry v. Donald Gudmanson
, and the evidence of record supports the decision. See State ex rel. Ortega v. McCaughtry, 221 Wis. 2d 376, 385
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15925 - 2017-09-21
, and the evidence of record supports the decision. See State ex rel. Ortega v. McCaughtry, 221 Wis. 2d 376, 385
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15925 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=615611 - 2023-02-01
and an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=615611 - 2023-02-01