Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9561 - 9570 of 98574 for civil court case status online.
Search results 9561 - 9570 of 98574 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
].” Welton argues that this court should remand the case to the circuit court with directions to grant his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=838827 - 2024-08-15
].” Welton argues that this court should remand the case to the circuit court with directions to grant his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=838827 - 2024-08-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the proceeding in the circuit court is a de novo civil action. See WIS. STAT. § 32.06(10) (providing for a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280738 - 2020-08-20
, the proceeding in the circuit court is a de novo civil action. See WIS. STAT. § 32.06(10) (providing for a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280738 - 2020-08-20
State v. Larry A. Peterson
the court erred by failing to allow him to cross-examine Thompson regarding a civil action that Thompson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7081 - 2005-03-31
the court erred by failing to allow him to cross-examine Thompson regarding a civil action that Thompson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7081 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Antonio D. Taborn
, the court nevertheless denied the mistrial motion because the case was prepared for trial, trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13675 - 2017-09-21
, the court nevertheless denied the mistrial motion because the case was prepared for trial, trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13675 - 2017-09-21
State v. Antonio D. Taborn
is not raised on appeal. [3] During the State’s case, Taborn stipulated to his status as a convicted felon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13675 - 2005-03-31
is not raised on appeal. [3] During the State’s case, Taborn stipulated to his status as a convicted felon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13675 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 16, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=427045 - 2021-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 16, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=427045 - 2021-09-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Frisch and the instant case, a central distinction is that here, the circuit court declined to find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174522 - 2017-09-21
Frisch and the instant case, a central distinction is that here, the circuit court declined to find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174522 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
” and that, through this argument, it seeks a “departure from existing case law.” This court, however, does not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101443 - 2013-08-28
” and that, through this argument, it seeks a “departure from existing case law.” This court, however, does not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101443 - 2013-08-28
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 18, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72347 - 2011-10-17
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 18, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72347 - 2011-10-17
State v. Thomas Deffke
civil liability; (2) the trial court did not properly consider Deffke's financial circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10255 - 2005-03-31
civil liability; (2) the trial court did not properly consider Deffke's financial circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10255 - 2005-03-31