Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9561 - 9570 of 28571 for f.
Search results 9561 - 9570 of 28571 for f.
State v. Brian W. Shaw
,” and, therefore, “[i]f I cannot incarcerate him for a period of 18 months in the La Crosse County Jail, then I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15120 - 2005-03-31
,” and, therefore, “[i]f I cannot incarcerate him for a period of 18 months in the La Crosse County Jail, then I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15120 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2021-22). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821310 - 2024-07-03
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2021-22). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821310 - 2024-07-03
State v. Eric J. Ball
(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f)(2001-02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5790 - 2005-03-31
(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f)(2001-02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5790 - 2005-03-31
Audrey Guzman v. St. Francis Hospital, Inc.
(in the court of appeals) by Mary Lee Ratzel, Peter F. Mullaney and Peterson, Johnson & Murray, S.C., Milwaukee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17434 - 2005-03-31
(in the court of appeals) by Mary Lee Ratzel, Peter F. Mullaney and Peterson, Johnson & Murray, S.C., Milwaukee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17434 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
answered, “Yes.” Our supreme court has stated that, “[i]f an accused admits to a prior offense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973611 - 2025-06-26
answered, “Yes.” Our supreme court has stated that, “[i]f an accused admits to a prior offense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973611 - 2025-06-26
Elsie Boltz v. Elmer Boltz
. [2] We also note that Elsie qualifies her argument by stating Budney is relevant "[i]f the origin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10053 - 2005-03-31
. [2] We also note that Elsie qualifies her argument by stating Budney is relevant "[i]f the origin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10053 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a civil confinement. See United States v. Restrepo, 999 F.2d 640, 646 (2nd Cir. 1993). Our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29451 - 2007-06-20
is a civil confinement. See United States v. Restrepo, 999 F.2d 640, 646 (2nd Cir. 1993). Our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29451 - 2007-06-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2021-22). All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821310 - 2024-07-03
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2021-22). All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821310 - 2024-07-03
Douglas Thums v. Village of Rib Lake
for failure to timely pay the special assessment as required by Wis. Stat. § 66.0703(12)(f). Thums argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26392 - 2006-09-05
for failure to timely pay the special assessment as required by Wis. Stat. § 66.0703(12)(f). Thums argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26392 - 2006-09-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2021-22). All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=761414 - 2024-02-14
and an 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2021-22). All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=761414 - 2024-02-14