Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9561 - 9570 of 75008 for judgment for us.
Search results 9561 - 9570 of 75008 for judgment for us.
Milwaukee County v. Ronald L. Collison
a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: richard j. sankovitz, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24879 - 2006-04-24
a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: richard j. sankovitz, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24879 - 2006-04-24
Terrence A. Borneman v. Corwyn Transport, Ltd.
). The court of appeals reversed a judgment of the Circuit Court for Marathon County, Raymond F. Thums, Judge
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17150 - 2005-03-31
). The court of appeals reversed a judgment of the Circuit Court for Marathon County, Raymond F. Thums, Judge
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17150 - 2005-03-31
Village of Cameron v. City of Barron
review a motion for summary judgment using the same methodology as the trial court. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16013 - 2005-03-31
review a motion for summary judgment using the same methodology as the trial court. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16013 - 2005-03-31
Great West Casualty Company, Inc. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
and that the summary judgment materials conclusively establish as a matter of law that Wisconsin Electric did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7986 - 2005-03-31
and that the summary judgment materials conclusively establish as a matter of law that Wisconsin Electric did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7986 - 2005-03-31
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Dane County’s motion for summary judgment on the ground of immunity under § 893.80(4). Therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6524 - 2013-12-09
Dane County’s motion for summary judgment on the ground of immunity under § 893.80(4). Therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6524 - 2013-12-09
[PDF]
Ray A. Peterson v. Department of Industry
We use the term “pre-verdict or pre-decision interest,” rather than “pre-judgment” interest, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14902 - 2017-09-21
We use the term “pre-verdict or pre-decision interest,” rather than “pre-judgment” interest, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14902 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Shirley Krug v. Cathy S. Zeuske
granted summary judgment, declared the law constitutional, and dismissed the plaintiffs' action. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8336 - 2017-09-19
granted summary judgment, declared the law constitutional, and dismissed the plaintiffs' action. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8336 - 2017-09-19
Shirley Krug v. Cathy S. Zeuske
granted summary judgment, declared the law constitutional, and dismissed the plaintiffs' action. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8336 - 2005-03-31
granted summary judgment, declared the law constitutional, and dismissed the plaintiffs' action. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8336 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Racine County, Charles H. Constantine, Judge. Reversed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118165 - 2014-07-24
from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Racine County, Charles H. Constantine, Judge. Reversed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118165 - 2014-07-24
[PDF]
Frontsheet
APPEAL from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Racine County, Charles H. Constantine, Judge. Reversed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118165 - 2014-09-15
APPEAL from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Racine County, Charles H. Constantine, Judge. Reversed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118165 - 2014-09-15