Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9571 - 9580 of 16451 for commenting.
Search results 9571 - 9580 of 16451 for commenting.
State v. George C. Harrell
It is also noteworthy that in its sentencing comments, the trial court did not state that Harrell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4205 - 2005-03-31
It is also noteworthy that in its sentencing comments, the trial court did not state that Harrell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4205 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eric T. Scott
comments at sentencing on the convictions here, Nos. 04-1687-CR, 04-1688-CR, 04-1689-CR, 04-1690
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17893 - 2017-09-21
comments at sentencing on the convictions here, Nos. 04-1687-CR, 04-1688-CR, 04-1689-CR, 04-1690
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17893 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence P. Hoffman
reluctant to give requested theory of defense instructions so as to avoid the appearance of commenting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4483 - 2017-09-19
reluctant to give requested theory of defense instructions so as to avoid the appearance of commenting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4483 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
James Merkel v. Village of Germantown
January 20, 1997. At the January hearing, after taking comments from Merkel and from others
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13273 - 2017-09-21
January 20, 1997. At the January hearing, after taking comments from Merkel and from others
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13273 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
sentencing discretion. We agree with counsel’s analysis on these issues; however, we comment briefly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948668 - 2025-04-30
sentencing discretion. We agree with counsel’s analysis on these issues; however, we comment briefly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948668 - 2025-04-30
[PDF]
State v. Douglas E. Fitch
that the circuit court applied the wrong legal standard to his motion to withdraw because the court commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4720 - 2017-09-19
that the circuit court applied the wrong legal standard to his motion to withdraw because the court commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4720 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Romel D.
was stopped. With respect to temporary stops, our supreme court has commented that “[t]o execute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15775 - 2017-09-21
was stopped. With respect to temporary stops, our supreme court has commented that “[t]o execute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15775 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Britten A.B.
added.) This court concedes that the trial court’s comment is, at the very least, confusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5297 - 2017-09-19
added.) This court concedes that the trial court’s comment is, at the very least, confusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5297 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Debbie A. Ramos
, the trial court was commenting on her credibility. This was an appropriate consideration under United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11448 - 2017-09-19
, the trial court was commenting on her credibility. This was an appropriate consideration under United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11448 - 2017-09-19
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jonathan C. Lewis
at his deposition, where opposing counsel twice commented that a conflict of interest existed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16608 - 2005-03-31
at his deposition, where opposing counsel twice commented that a conflict of interest existed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16608 - 2005-03-31