Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9581 - 9590 of 63317 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 9581 - 9590 of 63317 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the Honorable Mark F. Nielsen, who presided over the trial and also denied Peralta’s postverdict motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815329 - 2024-07-09
by the Honorable Mark F. Nielsen, who presided over the trial and also denied Peralta’s postverdict motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815329 - 2024-07-09
COURT OF APPEALS
’ motion because none of Gregory’s claims had sufficient evidentiary support. Gregory appeals. More facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36786 - 2009-06-16
’ motion because none of Gregory’s claims had sufficient evidentiary support. Gregory appeals. More facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36786 - 2009-06-16
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jay Andrew Felli
filed a motion seeking a temporary suspension of Attorney Felli's license on the ground that his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25629 - 2006-06-21
filed a motion seeking a temporary suspension of Attorney Felli's license on the ground that his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25629 - 2006-06-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to one of Kessler’s pro se motions in limine. All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2017
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265362 - 2020-06-23
to one of Kessler’s pro se motions in limine. All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2017
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265362 - 2020-06-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion to hold the Department of Corrections (DOC) in continuing contempt of court and to award him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919693 - 2025-02-25
motion to hold the Department of Corrections (DOC) in continuing contempt of court and to award him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919693 - 2025-02-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his motion for postconviction relief.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252876 - 2020-01-30
his motion for postconviction relief.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252876 - 2020-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
count of child enticement, as well as an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73240 - 2014-09-15
count of child enticement, as well as an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73240 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
motion.1 We conclude that Burkett is procedurally barred from raising and renewing issues he should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44702 - 2014-09-15
motion.1 We conclude that Burkett is procedurally barred from raising and renewing issues he should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44702 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion to hold the Department of Corrections (DOC) in continuing contempt of court and to award him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919693 - 2025-02-25
motion to hold the Department of Corrections (DOC) in continuing contempt of court and to award him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919693 - 2025-02-25
COURT OF APPEALS
a consolidated order summarily denying his postconviction motion.[1] We conclude that Burkett is procedurally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44702 - 2009-12-21
a consolidated order summarily denying his postconviction motion.[1] We conclude that Burkett is procedurally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44702 - 2009-12-21