Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9591 - 9600 of 83162 for case code.
Search results 9591 - 9600 of 83162 for case code.
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - April 2018
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES APRIL 2018 The cases listed below
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210764 - 2018-04-03
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES APRIL 2018 The cases listed below
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210764 - 2018-04-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111458 - 2017-09-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111458 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
No. 2012AP999 2 upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95987 - 2014-09-15
No. 2012AP999 2 upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95987 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
hereunder and shall be deemed a violation of this section. See SHAWANO, WIS., CODE § 7.01(8) (2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59760 - 2014-09-15
hereunder and shall be deemed a violation of this section. See SHAWANO, WIS., CODE § 7.01(8) (2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59760 - 2014-09-15
Chad Boyles v. Milwaukee County
The parties disagree on what authority controls the outcome of this case. Boyles and the architects urge us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2137 - 2005-03-31
The parties disagree on what authority controls the outcome of this case. Boyles and the architects urge us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2137 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
legal conclusions in this case are entitled to great weight deference, as the Commission “has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143554 - 2017-09-21
legal conclusions in this case are entitled to great weight deference, as the Commission “has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143554 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
cost.” WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DCF 150.02(29). No. 2015AP1428 3 of the pleadings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170113 - 2017-09-21
cost.” WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DCF 150.02(29). No. 2015AP1428 3 of the pleadings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170113 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Town of Mount Pleasant v. Gerald A. Hoornstra
An ordinance violation had been issued pursuant to § 10.05 of the Town of Mount Pleasant General Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15195 - 2017-09-21
An ordinance violation had been issued pursuant to § 10.05 of the Town of Mount Pleasant General Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15195 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lamart C. Cammon
. ADM. CODE § PD 2.04. No(s). 98-3561-CR-NM 3 pro se with the attorney acting as stand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14898 - 2017-09-21
. ADM. CODE § PD 2.04. No(s). 98-3561-CR-NM 3 pro se with the attorney acting as stand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14898 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 279. The Commission’s legal conclusions in this case are entitled to great weight deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143554 - 2015-06-29
N.W.2d 279. The Commission’s legal conclusions in this case are entitled to great weight deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143554 - 2015-06-29