Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 961 - 970 of 68466 for did.
Search results 961 - 970 of 68466 for did.
State v. Robert J. Capps
a postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas in which he contended that he did not understand the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11931 - 2005-03-31
a postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas in which he contended that he did not understand the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11931 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randall M. Miller
because the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop him or probable cause to arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16238 - 2017-09-21
because the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop him or probable cause to arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16238 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 23, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of...
accepting Krivoshein’s no contest pleas. The Court: First of all, did anyone make any threat or use any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34096 - 2008-09-22
accepting Krivoshein’s no contest pleas. The Court: First of all, did anyone make any threat or use any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34096 - 2008-09-22
[PDF]
Richard Eggers v. Cumberland Farmers Union
that the conduct of the Eggers’ attorney, Bruce Scott Johnson, did not constitute mistake, inadvertence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11053 - 2017-09-19
that the conduct of the Eggers’ attorney, Bruce Scott Johnson, did not constitute mistake, inadvertence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11053 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
argues the circuit court did not comply with the statutory requirements for granting Constance’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46877 - 2010-02-08
argues the circuit court did not comply with the statutory requirements for granting Constance’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46877 - 2010-02-08
COURT OF APPEALS
defense expert witnesses; (2) the real controversy was not fully tried because her counsel did not present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88087 - 2012-10-10
defense expert witnesses; (2) the real controversy was not fully tried because her counsel did not present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88087 - 2012-10-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that Garrett did not sufficiently prove that he was prejudiced. We agree and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289121 - 2020-09-23
argues that Garrett did not sufficiently prove that he was prejudiced. We agree and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289121 - 2020-09-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
contends the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44738 - 2014-09-15
contends the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44738 - 2014-09-15
Richard Eggers v. Cumberland Farmers Union
that the conduct of the Eggers’ attorney, Bruce Scott Johnson, did not constitute mistake, inadvertence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11053 - 2010-12-20
that the conduct of the Eggers’ attorney, Bruce Scott Johnson, did not constitute mistake, inadvertence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11053 - 2010-12-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the hearing on his motion to reopen. Casimir offers reasons for why he did not appear at the motion hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=881999 - 2024-11-26
at the hearing on his motion to reopen. Casimir offers reasons for why he did not appear at the motion hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=881999 - 2024-11-26