Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 961 - 970 of 1244 for syke.

Frontsheet
being detained——the area within which he or she could "lunge." (Compare State v. Sykes, 2005 WI 48, ¶20
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66883 - 2011-06-28

The Baldewein Company v. Tri-Clover, Inc.
Circuit. Certified question answered and cause remanded. ¶1 DIANE S. SYKES, J. This case is before
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17486 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 49
of the person being detained——the area within which he or she could "lunge." (Compare State v. Sykes, 2005 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66883 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Richard W. Ziervogel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. ¶1 DIANE S. SYKES, J. We are called upon
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16640 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Pamela L. Peters
. 1 DIANE S. SYKES, J. This case is before the court on certification from the court of appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16573 - 2017-09-21

Tri-Tech Corporation of America v. Americomp Services, Inc.
Davis, Circuit Court Judge. Reversed and cause remanded. ¶1 DIANE S. SYKES, J. The issue
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16447 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Tri-Tech Corporation of America v. Americomp Services, Inc.
. SYKES, J. The issue in this case is whether the treble damages remedy of Wis. Stat. § 895.80 (1999
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16447 - 2017-09-21

State v. Lawrence A. Williams
. Reversed. ¶1 DIANE S. SYKES, J. This case involves a consent search of a vehicle, and the issue
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16479 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
, the officer is not required to formally arrest before the search. State v. Sykes, 2005 WI 48, ¶15, 279
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669658 - 2023-06-21

Dustin Dowhower v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Company
clause is ambiguous. Two members of the court, Justices Prosser and Sykes, find the contract unambiguous
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17437 - 2005-03-31