Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9601 - 9610 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
Search results 9601 - 9610 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
Jay W. Smith v. Paul Katz
). Our review is de novo. See id. at 115, 334 N.W.2d at 582. Further, this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11101 - 2005-03-31
). Our review is de novo. See id. at 115, 334 N.W.2d at 582. Further, this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11101 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ralph D. Smythe
the implied consent law and, as such, the issues raised are questions of law, which we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13222 - 2005-03-31
the implied consent law and, as such, the issues raised are questions of law, which we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13222 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael James Last
reviews de novo. See State v. Wilson, 149 Wis. 2d 878, 898, 440 N.W.2d 534 (1989). ¶5 Last
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4895 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo. See State v. Wilson, 149 Wis. 2d 878, 898, 440 N.W.2d 534 (1989). ¶5 Last
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4895 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and application of legal principles, including supreme court precedent, to undisputed facts is de novo. Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117799 - 2014-07-29
and application of legal principles, including supreme court precedent, to undisputed facts is de novo. Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117799 - 2014-07-29
[PDF]
State v. Emlin E. Landreth
review de novo. See id. ¶10 Here, the circuit court made findings of fact which are not clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4238 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. See id. ¶10 Here, the circuit court made findings of fact which are not clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4238 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. William Hardy Thornton, Jr.
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10283 - 2017-09-20
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10283 - 2017-09-20
City of Menomonie v. Jonathan Skibbe
of fact pass statutory or constitutional muster is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15773 - 2005-03-31
of fact pass statutory or constitutional muster is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15773 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Catherine M. Parrilli
cause to arrest is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Williams, 104 Wis. 2d 15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17867 - 2017-09-21
cause to arrest is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Williams, 104 Wis. 2d 15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17867 - 2017-09-21
State v. Scott A. Unertl
standards is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶7 The police officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21440 - 2006-02-15
standards is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶7 The police officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21440 - 2006-02-15
State v. Timothy Netzer
provisions to undisputed facts, which is a question of law we review de novo. Millers Nat’l Ins. Co. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12587 - 2005-03-31
provisions to undisputed facts, which is a question of law we review de novo. Millers Nat’l Ins. Co. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12587 - 2005-03-31