Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9601 - 9610 of 16460 for h's.
Search results 9601 - 9610 of 16460 for h's.
State v. Jerry B. Rooni
for Lincoln County: glenn h. hartley, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.[1] Jerry Rooni appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5548 - 2005-03-31
for Lincoln County: glenn h. hartley, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.[1] Jerry Rooni appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5548 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
274, 258 Wis. 2d 584, 654 N.W.2d 24, “[w]e h[e]ld that Wis. Stat. § 973.01(2)(c) [(1999-2000)] does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42994 - 2009-11-02
274, 258 Wis. 2d 584, 654 N.W.2d 24, “[w]e h[e]ld that Wis. Stat. § 973.01(2)(c) [(1999-2000)] does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42994 - 2009-11-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as the circuit court properly examined each factor. See State v. Margaret H., 2000 WI 42, ¶¶29, 35, 234 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251969 - 2020-01-03
as the circuit court properly examined each factor. See State v. Margaret H., 2000 WI 42, ¶¶29, 35, 234 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251969 - 2020-01-03
COURT OF APPEALS
809.30(2)(h). [5] This does not, however, explain Malone’s failure to raise the issue in his March 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36009 - 2009-03-30
809.30(2)(h). [5] This does not, however, explain Malone’s failure to raise the issue in his March 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36009 - 2009-03-30
[PDF]
State v. Roger W. Hubbard
of marijuana with intent to deliver within 1000 feet of a school in violation of §§ 939.05, 961.41(1m)(h
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14523 - 2017-09-21
of marijuana with intent to deliver within 1000 feet of a school in violation of §§ 939.05, 961.41(1m)(h
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14523 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and would be in the interest of justice,” see § PAC 1.06(16)(h). As we explained in Barbeau, a juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191298 - 2017-09-21
and would be in the interest of justice,” see § PAC 1.06(16)(h). As we explained in Barbeau, a juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191298 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ripple Management v. Diana Goodavage
, or excusable neglect, § 806.07(1)(a), and any other reasons justifying relief, § 806.07(1)(h). The decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4474 - 2017-09-19
, or excusable neglect, § 806.07(1)(a), and any other reasons justifying relief, § 806.07(1)(h). The decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4474 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, fourth offense, contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 346.63(1)(b), 939.50(3)(h). This charge, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866064 - 2024-10-23
, fourth offense, contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 346.63(1)(b), 939.50(3)(h). This charge, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866064 - 2024-10-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” in relitigating such a case that could potentially cause confusion for the jury: “[H]ow do you explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255844 - 2020-03-10
” in relitigating such a case that could potentially cause confusion for the jury: “[H]ow do you explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255844 - 2020-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS
THC, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(h)1. Adrian moved to suppress evidence of the contraband
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32070 - 2008-03-11
THC, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(h)1. Adrian moved to suppress evidence of the contraband
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32070 - 2008-03-11