Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9601 - 9610 of 63956 for records.
Search results 9601 - 9610 of 63956 for records.
State v. Daniel Scott Peterson
upon the record to justify their individual acts. That their acts have no basis in fact or law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15154 - 2005-03-31
upon the record to justify their individual acts. That their acts have no basis in fact or law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15154 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2017AP2403-NM 2 for A.B. 2 A.B. has not responded. 3 Upon an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212350 - 2018-05-09
. No. 2017AP2403-NM 2 for A.B. 2 A.B. has not responded. 3 Upon an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212350 - 2018-05-09
[PDF]
State v. Kristen K. Gamer
. We conclude that the trial court did not make an adequate record of its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9021 - 2017-09-19
. We conclude that the trial court did not make an adequate record of its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9021 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134438 - 2017-09-21
. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134438 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Oliver A. Pentinmaki, Jr. v. Mary C. Volker
to harass her. The record fully supports these conclusions. We therefore affirm. An abuse of process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7769 - 2017-09-19
to harass her. The record fully supports these conclusions. We therefore affirm. An abuse of process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7769 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon consideration of the no-merit reports and an independent review of the records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307476 - 2020-11-25
not filed a response. Upon consideration of the no-merit reports and an independent review of the records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307476 - 2020-11-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254999 - 2020-02-25
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254999 - 2020-02-25
[PDF]
State v. Torey U. Jennings
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12974 - 2017-09-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12974 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
as the no-merit procedures were in fact followed, and the record demonstrates a sufficient degree of confidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32208 - 2008-03-24
as the no-merit procedures were in fact followed, and the record demonstrates a sufficient degree of confidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32208 - 2008-03-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174941 - 2017-09-21
right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174941 - 2017-09-21