Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9631 - 9640 of 74479 for public records.
Search results 9631 - 9640 of 74479 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208152 - 2018-02-05
record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208152 - 2018-02-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Suzanne L. Hagopian Assistant State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707 Kurt F
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109743 - 2017-09-21
Suzanne L. Hagopian Assistant State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707 Kurt F
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109743 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
colloquy, and counsel has filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195483 - 2017-09-21
colloquy, and counsel has filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195483 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Asst. State Public Defender P. O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707-7862 Gregory M. Weber Assistant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134232 - 2017-09-21
Asst. State Public Defender P. O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707-7862 Gregory M. Weber Assistant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134232 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ervin Merten v. Carl Holzer
, removal of the affidavit from the public records and preclusion of Holzer’s future use of the way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11935 - 2017-09-21
, removal of the affidavit from the public records and preclusion of Holzer’s future use of the way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11935 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
too much weight on his prior record and did not consider mitigating factors that supported a lighter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86886 - 2014-09-15
too much weight on his prior record and did not consider mitigating factors that supported a lighter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86886 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007198 - 2025-09-09
not responded. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007198 - 2025-09-09
Ervin Merten v. Carl Holzer
the public records and preclusion of Holzer’s future use of the way of necessity. In his answer, Holzer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11935 - 2005-03-31
the public records and preclusion of Holzer’s future use of the way of necessity. In his answer, Holzer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11935 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the records, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91451 - 2014-09-15
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the records, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91451 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court misused its sentencing discretion because it placed too much weight on his prior record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86886 - 2012-09-10
that the circuit court misused its sentencing discretion because it placed too much weight on his prior record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86886 - 2012-09-10