Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9651 - 9660 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 9651 - 9660 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and three years of extended supervision) for second-degree recklessly endangering safety
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237166 - 2019-03-13
confinement and three years of extended supervision) for second-degree recklessly endangering safety
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237166 - 2019-03-13
State v. Gwendolyn K. Moody
offered no authority extending the Fry/Verhasselt rule to statements against interest made by a party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15568 - 2005-03-31
offered no authority extending the Fry/Verhasselt rule to statements against interest made by a party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15568 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses whether McAuly’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231721 - 2019-01-09
of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses whether McAuly’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231721 - 2019-01-09
COURT OF APPEALS
of extended supervision. Santiago appealed. ¶3 Santiago’s appointed counsel filed a no-merit under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30065 - 2007-08-27
of extended supervision. Santiago appealed. ¶3 Santiago’s appointed counsel filed a no-merit under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30065 - 2007-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
v. State, 35 Wis. 2d 317, 322, 151 N.W.2d 36 (1967). This immunity extends to state agencies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32701 - 2008-05-14
v. State, 35 Wis. 2d 317, 322, 151 N.W.2d 36 (1967). This immunity extends to state agencies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32701 - 2008-05-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
followed by ten years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176513 - 2017-09-21
followed by ten years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176513 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion is extended to July 30, 2018. No. 2017AP525-CRNM 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214778 - 2018-06-26
motion is extended to July 30, 2018. No. 2017AP525-CRNM 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214778 - 2018-06-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and three years of extended supervision. First, the no-merit report addresses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164137 - 2017-09-21
confinement and three years of extended supervision. First, the no-merit report addresses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164137 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentenced Jones to six years of initial confinement and four years of extended supervision. This no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157140 - 2017-09-21
sentenced Jones to six years of initial confinement and four years of extended supervision. This no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157140 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence, consisting of six years of initial confinement followed by four years of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865575 - 2024-10-22
sentence, consisting of six years of initial confinement followed by four years of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865575 - 2024-10-22