Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9651 - 9660 of 17241 for probate/1000.
Search results 9651 - 9660 of 17241 for probate/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
probation. Our decision denying Obriecht’s direct appeal from his sentencing following that revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54227 - 2010-09-15
probation. Our decision denying Obriecht’s direct appeal from his sentencing following that revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54227 - 2010-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the State would jointly recommend a withheld sentence and two years’ probation. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=587934 - 2022-11-08
and the State would jointly recommend a withheld sentence and two years’ probation. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=587934 - 2022-11-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was on extended supervision in a prior hit-and-run case, when Schwan had actually been on probation in the hit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209478 - 2018-03-08
was on extended supervision in a prior hit-and-run case, when Schwan had actually been on probation in the hit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209478 - 2018-03-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Within five days of being out of custody, J.H. was back in custody on a probation hold and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=869605 - 2024-10-31
. Within five days of being out of custody, J.H. was back in custody on a probation hold and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=869605 - 2024-10-31
State v. John S. Bergmann
while armed and placed Bergmann on fifteen years of probation consecutive to the prison sentences. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14344 - 2005-03-31
while armed and placed Bergmann on fifteen years of probation consecutive to the prison sentences. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14344 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
priority to purchase the farm, moved to exclude it from probate, contending Margaret lacked testamentary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48630 - 2010-04-05
priority to purchase the farm, moved to exclude it from probate, contending Margaret lacked testamentary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48630 - 2010-04-05
State v. Charles V. Royster
to protect the public and why it felt that probation would not be appropriate in this case: “In looking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24971 - 2006-05-01
to protect the public and why it felt that probation would not be appropriate in this case: “In looking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24971 - 2006-05-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
the revocation of Obriecht’s probation. Our decision denying Obriecht’s direct appeal from his sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54227 - 2014-09-15
the revocation of Obriecht’s probation. Our decision denying Obriecht’s direct appeal from his sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54227 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
version. [2] The circuit court specifically rejected probation because probation would unduly depreciate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133858 - 2015-02-03
version. [2] The circuit court specifically rejected probation because probation would unduly depreciate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133858 - 2015-02-03
State v. Wallace J. Hammerle
to protect him because he was wanted by the police as a probation absconder, but decided to tell the truth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6230 - 2005-03-31
to protect him because he was wanted by the police as a probation absconder, but decided to tell the truth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6230 - 2005-03-31