Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9651 - 9660 of 83741 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 9651 - 9660 of 83741 for simple case search/1000.
State v. Jon W. Miller
the evidence seized at his home pursuant to a search warrant because: (1) the affidavit in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3928 - 2005-03-31
the evidence seized at his home pursuant to a search warrant because: (1) the affidavit in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3928 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jon W. Miller
that the trial court should have suppressed the evidence seized at his home pursuant to a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3928 - 2017-09-20
that the trial court should have suppressed the evidence seized at his home pursuant to a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3928 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
County circuit court case No. 2013CF956 with one count of delivering cocaine as a second or subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171258 - 2017-09-21
County circuit court case No. 2013CF956 with one count of delivering cocaine as a second or subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171258 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
disease or defect (NGI), and failing to seek the suppression of evidence procured under a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29358 - 2007-06-12
disease or defect (NGI), and failing to seek the suppression of evidence procured under a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29358 - 2007-06-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109971 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109971 - 2017-09-21
State v. Raymond Johnson
establish the basis for the search in this case. Johnson maintains, however, that the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12966 - 2005-03-31
establish the basis for the search in this case. Johnson maintains, however, that the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12966 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Raymond Johnson
establish the basis for the search in this case. Johnson maintains, however, that the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12966 - 2017-09-21
establish the basis for the search in this case. Johnson maintains, however, that the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12966 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Monsour
that the seizure of the blood was taken unreasonably without a required search warrant. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15980 - 2017-09-21
that the seizure of the blood was taken unreasonably without a required search warrant. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15980 - 2017-09-21
State v. James C. Stigney
, arguing that the seizure of the blood was taken unreasonably without a required search warrant. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16161 - 2005-03-31
, arguing that the seizure of the blood was taken unreasonably without a required search warrant. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16161 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael L. Monsour
unreasonably without a required search warrant. The trial court denied the motion. Again on appeal, Monsour
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15980 - 2005-03-31
unreasonably without a required search warrant. The trial court denied the motion. Again on appeal, Monsour
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15980 - 2005-03-31