Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9651 - 9660 of 58531 for speedy trial.
Search results 9651 - 9660 of 58531 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Debra Christie v. John Husz
that the trial court erred when it granted John Husz’s 1 motion to dismiss her writ of habeas corpus because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12239 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court erred when it granted John Husz’s 1 motion to dismiss her writ of habeas corpus because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12239 - 2017-09-21
State v. James Jagodinsky
a harassment injunction. Jagodinsky claims that the trial court erred when it denied his objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11555 - 2005-03-31
a harassment injunction. Jagodinsky claims that the trial court erred when it denied his objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11555 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
corpus relief in the trial court, seeking the reinstatement of his direct appeal time limits in order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95386 - 2014-09-15
corpus relief in the trial court, seeking the reinstatement of his direct appeal time limits in order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95386 - 2014-09-15
State v. Matthew D.B.
) and 939.05 (1997-98).[2] Matthew argues that Wis. Stat. § 938.34(5)(a) does not provide the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2344 - 2005-03-31
) and 939.05 (1997-98).[2] Matthew argues that Wis. Stat. § 938.34(5)(a) does not provide the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2344 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) that his trial lawyer was ineffective for failing to request a limiting jury instruction with respect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98373 - 2014-09-15
) that his trial lawyer was ineffective for failing to request a limiting jury instruction with respect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98373 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presided over the trial. No. 2017AP2146-CR 2 Per curiam opinions may not be cited in any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216042 - 2018-07-24
presided over the trial. No. 2017AP2146-CR 2 Per curiam opinions may not be cited in any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216042 - 2018-07-24
[PDF]
State v. James Jagodinsky
a judgment of conviction for violating a harassment injunction. Jagodinsky claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11555 - 2017-09-19
a judgment of conviction for violating a harassment injunction. Jagodinsky claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11555 - 2017-09-19
Robert B. Corris v. Barton Peck
and on behalf of the Rose Peck Trust, appeals from the judgment and orders of the trial court, dismissing his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7425 - 2005-03-31
and on behalf of the Rose Peck Trust, appeals from the judgment and orders of the trial court, dismissing his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7425 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel Aguilar
in the preliminary hearing testimony.[2] At the December 8, 1995 motion hearing, the trial court proposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12114 - 2005-03-31
in the preliminary hearing testimony.[2] At the December 8, 1995 motion hearing, the trial court proposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12114 - 2005-03-31
Martin C. H. v. Jill E. S.
of the trial court which gave Martin C. H. unsupervised placement with their child Tristan D. S. Jill contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25682 - 2006-06-26
of the trial court which gave Martin C. H. unsupervised placement with their child Tristan D. S. Jill contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25682 - 2006-06-26