Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9661 - 9670 of 30134 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. State v. Bodoh, 226 Wis. 2d 718, 724, 595 N.W.2d 330 (1999). ¶5 Ozuna argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165180 - 2017-09-21

Dane County Department of Human Services v. Dana E.
to be that the court did not apply the correct legal standard. This presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4247 - 2005-03-31

Jay W. Smith v. Paul Katz
). Our review is de novo. See id. at 115, 334 N.W.2d at 582. Further, this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11101 - 2005-03-31

State v. Johnnie Hunter
on inaccurate information presents a legal issue subject to our de novo review. See State v. Littrup, 164 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8346 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 135
)(b). The interpretation of a statute is a question of law subject to de novo review. West v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69581 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. Schauer v. Baker
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904957 - 2025-01-24

Kerry L. Farmer v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. De Quaine, 24 Wis.2d 23, 32, 127 N.W.2d 788, 793 (1964); see also State v. Peters, 192 Wis.2d 674
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9478 - 2005-03-31

State v. Matthew A. Joas
de novo whether those facts meet the constitutional standard. Williams, 241 Wis. 2d 631, ¶18. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26055 - 2006-08-01

State v. Randolph A. Clark
a refusal to submit to a blood-alcohol test is proper or improper “is a question of law” that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5197 - 2005-03-31

Waukesha County Department Of Health and Human Services v. John S.
the trial court's decision de novo. See Breier v. E.C., 130 Wis.2d 376, 381, 387 N.W.2d 72, 74 (1986
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10159 - 2005-03-31