Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9661 - 9670 of 83724 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 9661 - 9670 of 83724 for simple case search/1000.
State v. Chad Williams
appeared to be cocaine. The officer arrested Williams and searched him incident to the arrest, finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14046 - 2005-03-31
appeared to be cocaine. The officer arrested Williams and searched him incident to the arrest, finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14046 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a protective search for weapons. We agree with Mellum that, under State v. Mohr, 2000 WI App 111, 235 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33426 - 2008-07-16
a protective search for weapons. We agree with Mellum that, under State v. Mohr, 2000 WI App 111, 235 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33426 - 2008-07-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
-CR 2 denying his motion to suppress evidence that resulted from a protective search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33426 - 2014-09-15
-CR 2 denying his motion to suppress evidence that resulted from a protective search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33426 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Carl H. Zahn
to a warrantless search. In the context of a warrantless search, the burden is on the State to show by clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9093 - 2017-09-19
to a warrantless search. In the context of a warrantless search, the burden is on the State to show by clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9093 - 2017-09-19
State v. Carl H. Zahn
is the same as that established for consent to a warrantless search. In the context of a warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9093 - 2005-03-31
is the same as that established for consent to a warrantless search. In the context of a warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9093 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donald R. Goldsworthy
postconviction motion.[1] On May 28, 1994, police officers obtained a search warrant, entered Goldsworthy’s home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11211 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion.[1] On May 28, 1994, police officers obtained a search warrant, entered Goldsworthy’s home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11211 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Donald R. Goldsworthy
on Goldsworthy’s postconviction motion.1 On May 28, 1994, police officers obtained a search warrant, entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11211 - 2017-09-19
on Goldsworthy’s postconviction motion.1 On May 28, 1994, police officers obtained a search warrant, entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11211 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
said he did not have an ID and would not allow himself to be searched), and brought him to the squad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93381 - 2014-09-15
said he did not have an ID and would not allow himself to be searched), and brought him to the squad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93381 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, apprehending him in the foyer just inside the lower unit. Neibauer conducted a pat-down search of Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50188 - 2010-05-24
, apprehending him in the foyer just inside the lower unit. Neibauer conducted a pat-down search of Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50188 - 2010-05-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
in the foyer just inside the lower unit. Neibauer conducted a pat-down search of Smith, finding no drugs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50188 - 2014-09-15
in the foyer just inside the lower unit. Neibauer conducted a pat-down search of Smith, finding no drugs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50188 - 2014-09-15