Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9671 - 9680 of 16451 for commenting.
Search results 9671 - 9680 of 16451 for commenting.
State v. Shulbert Z. Williams
sentencing comments reflect “a process of reasoning based on legally relevant factors.” State v. Wickstrom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2812 - 2005-03-31
sentencing comments reflect “a process of reasoning based on legally relevant factors.” State v. Wickstrom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2812 - 2005-03-31
Elizabeth M. Marzouki v. Jamel Marzouki
equation. [6] The court commented that, “I feel like I’m doing a temporary order in this case. I think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11856 - 2005-03-31
equation. [6] The court commented that, “I feel like I’m doing a temporary order in this case. I think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11856 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bruce J. Kuechler
of the law but had no comment on the appropriate fine. We agree with Kuechler that “[i]t is not clear why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5225 - 2009-02-17
of the law but had no comment on the appropriate fine. We agree with Kuechler that “[i]t is not clear why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5225 - 2009-02-17
Tris S. Treviranus v. Jay Treviranus
. On the one hand, the record is replete with the trial court’s comments evincing its impatience with Tris’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12398 - 2005-05-09
. On the one hand, the record is replete with the trial court’s comments evincing its impatience with Tris’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12398 - 2005-05-09
State v. Larry A. Coon
that the police did not have probable cause to arrest him. See id. He argues the comments of the supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5103 - 2005-03-31
that the police did not have probable cause to arrest him. See id. He argues the comments of the supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5103 - 2005-03-31
Debra Christie v. John Husz
and dismissed the case with prejudice. It commented that the dismissal was “[b]ased on the nonappearance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12239 - 2005-03-31
and dismissed the case with prejudice. It commented that the dismissal was “[b]ased on the nonappearance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12239 - 2005-03-31
State v. Travis E. Blanks
." The trial court's comments belie any contention of systematic exclusion of African-Americans as jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9874 - 2005-03-31
." The trial court's comments belie any contention of systematic exclusion of African-Americans as jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9874 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in the background during previous Skype visits, making comments about her and to her. Julie submitted that she felt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144517 - 2015-07-15
in the background during previous Skype visits, making comments about her and to her. Julie submitted that she felt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144517 - 2015-07-15
State v. Michael Schulteis
. Prosecutor’s Comment During Closing. ¶20 Schulteis argues that trial counsel was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4102 - 2005-03-31
. Prosecutor’s Comment During Closing. ¶20 Schulteis argues that trial counsel was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4102 - 2005-03-31
State v. Derek E.
are representative of the court’s comments at both hearings: There have been 21 referrals and several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13282 - 2005-03-31
are representative of the court’s comments at both hearings: There have been 21 referrals and several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13282 - 2005-03-31