Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9671 - 9680 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 9671 - 9680 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, consisting of seventeen years’ initial confinement followed by eighteen years’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95361 - 2014-09-15
, consisting of seventeen years’ initial confinement followed by eighteen years’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95361 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. The record establishes that the circuit court considered the general objectives
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=566573 - 2022-09-20
of extended supervision. The record establishes that the circuit court considered the general objectives
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=566573 - 2022-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. This no- merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses whether the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205968 - 2017-12-27
of extended supervision. This no- merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses whether the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205968 - 2017-12-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The circuit court sentenced him to five years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206776 - 2018-01-10
. The circuit court sentenced him to five years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206776 - 2018-01-10
Milwaukee County v. Anthony C.
, this appeal is not moot even though Anthony C.'s original commitment order expired; it was extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9807 - 2005-03-31
, this appeal is not moot even though Anthony C.'s original commitment order expired; it was extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9807 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. The record establishes that the circuit court carefully considered and applied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220608 - 2018-10-03
of extended supervision. The record establishes that the circuit court carefully considered and applied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220608 - 2018-10-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ initial confinement and seven years’ extended supervision. 1 The court’s plea colloquy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109476 - 2017-09-21
’ initial confinement and seven years’ extended supervision. 1 The court’s plea colloquy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109476 - 2017-09-21
State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
concurrent terms of thirty-six months of initial confinement and twenty months of extended supervision. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6415 - 2005-03-31
concurrent terms of thirty-six months of initial confinement and twenty months of extended supervision. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6415 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
confinement and four years of extended supervision, as to each count.[3] First, the no-merit report addresses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129467 - 2014-11-17
confinement and four years of extended supervision, as to each count.[3] First, the no-merit report addresses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129467 - 2014-11-17
[PDF]
State v. Ollie B. Smith
that the police impermissibly extended the scope of the stop. Because the police violated the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3026 - 2017-09-19
that the police impermissibly extended the scope of the stop. Because the police violated the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3026 - 2017-09-19