Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9681 - 9690 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 9681 - 9690 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
State v. James Gulley
). As there is no factual dispute over the dates on which Gulley was in custody, we will determine de novo the appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15238 - 2005-03-31
). As there is no factual dispute over the dates on which Gulley was in custody, we will determine de novo the appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15238 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jason D. Galewski
Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App. 1994). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4259 - 2005-03-31
Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App. 1994). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4259 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mark R. Voss v. Sentry Insurance
involves construction of an insurance policy, we review the trial court’s decision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11246 - 2017-09-19
involves construction of an insurance policy, we review the trial court’s decision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11246 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
application to undisputed facts, review is de novo. ¶10 Corona properly frames the standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110435 - 2014-04-16
application to undisputed facts, review is de novo. ¶10 Corona properly frames the standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110435 - 2014-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
determination is, however, de novo. Id., 2005 WI 48, ¶12, 279 Wis. 2d at 751, 695 N.W.2d at 282. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32654 - 2008-05-12
determination is, however, de novo. Id., 2005 WI 48, ¶12, 279 Wis. 2d at 751, 695 N.W.2d at 282. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32654 - 2008-05-12
State v. Otis J. Martin
the circuit court’s decision not to hold an evidentiary hearing de novo, independently determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13734 - 2005-03-31
the circuit court’s decision not to hold an evidentiary hearing de novo, independently determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13734 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial. Id. To show
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341462 - 2021-03-03
. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial. Id. To show
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341462 - 2021-03-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
constitutes a new factor is a question of law that this court considers de novo. Id., ¶33. However, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741921 - 2023-12-19
constitutes a new factor is a question of law that this court considers de novo. Id., ¶33. However, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741921 - 2023-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
judgment decision de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Koepsell’s Olde Popcorn
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=325544 - 2021-01-20
judgment decision de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Koepsell’s Olde Popcorn
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=325544 - 2021-01-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 We review de novo whether the evidence presented at trial is sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87060 - 2012-09-18
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 We review de novo whether the evidence presented at trial is sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87060 - 2012-09-18