Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 971 - 980 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 971 - 980 of 12912 for prosecuting.
State v. Luis Cardenas-Hernandez
to the circuit court during preliminary proceedings in a prior criminal prosecution; and (2) Whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17195 - 2005-03-31
to the circuit court during preliminary proceedings in a prior criminal prosecution; and (2) Whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17195 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 77
to “consider the facts of the individual case in evaluating the [g]overnment’s interest in prosecution.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041774 - 2026-01-26
to “consider the facts of the individual case in evaluating the [g]overnment’s interest in prosecution.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041774 - 2026-01-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. First, Caminiti argues that the prosecutor’s theory of prosecution violated three constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109274 - 2017-09-21
. First, Caminiti argues that the prosecutor’s theory of prosecution violated three constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109274 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Luis Cardenas-Hernandez
court during preliminary proceedings in a prior criminal prosecution; and (2) Whether the absolute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17195 - 2017-09-21
court during preliminary proceedings in a prior criminal prosecution; and (2) Whether the absolute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17195 - 2017-09-21
Virginia Wustrack v. Beverly Enterprises-Wisconsin, Inc.
to prosecute. She argues that the trial court misused its discretion in dismissing the case. Pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11191 - 2005-03-31
to prosecute. She argues that the trial court misused its discretion in dismissing the case. Pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11191 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James N. Sutherland
three protections. "`It protects against a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7825 - 2017-09-19
three protections. "`It protects against a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7825 - 2017-09-19
State v. Christopher S. Oglesby
makes an undeveloped remark that the prosecution breached the plea agreement in its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5299 - 2005-03-31
makes an undeveloped remark that the prosecution breached the plea agreement in its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5299 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark R. Umhoefer
the prosecution’s failure to firmly establish a motive for injuring the baby. The evidence established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11701 - 2017-09-20
the prosecution’s failure to firmly establish a motive for injuring the baby. The evidence established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11701 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Peterson
, the State would move to revoke the deferred prosecution agreement and he would face sentencing upon his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7178 - 2017-09-20
, the State would move to revoke the deferred prosecution agreement and he would face sentencing upon his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7178 - 2017-09-20
State v. James N. Sutherland
] The Double Jeopardy Clause embodies three protections. "`It protects against a second prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7825 - 2005-03-31
] The Double Jeopardy Clause embodies three protections. "`It protects against a second prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7825 - 2005-03-31