Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 971 - 980 of 96723 for state case.

State v. Lindsey A.F.
attorney and the court, the case simply disappears. The State’s concern seems legitimate, but it does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3483 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Marvin Prince
also denied that his former counsel had gone over the State’s case with him, claiming that “[h]e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12353 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael Newago
substance offenses. At the close of the State’s case, the State, over Newago’s continuing objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20080 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Sammy Gates
on the facts and circumstances of the case. See State v. Sartin, 200 Wis.2d 47, 52, 546 N.W.2d 449, 451
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13718 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Frederick H.
that these issues could not be relitigated in the TPR case.6 ¶10 The State and the trial court have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3240 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Frederick H.
that these issues could not be relitigated in the TPR case.6 ¶10 The State and the trial court have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3239 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Frank Curiel
in failing to grant his motion to dismiss at the close of the State’s case; (2) there was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12454 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Teressa S.
WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Nos. 00-1023 00-1024 STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2500 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Christopher Anderson
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2005AP446-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2002CF2495 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21458 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Teressa S.
WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Nos. 00-1023 00-1024 STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2501 - 2017-09-19