Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 971 - 980 of 20924 for word.
Search results 971 - 980 of 20924 for word.
COURT OF APPEALS
it to her word for word” and evidently understood it because she made a correction. These findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51363 - 2010-06-29
it to her word for word” and evidently understood it because she made a correction. These findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51363 - 2010-06-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
words, “[t]he State did not need to prove that [Greer] threatened [J.D.H.] in order to obtain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252447 - 2020-01-22
words, “[t]he State did not need to prove that [Greer] threatened [J.D.H.] in order to obtain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252447 - 2020-01-22
[PDF]
Tammy Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.
). Thus, the core question is whether the legislature intended that the word “costs” in § 218.01(9)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24877 - 2017-09-21
). Thus, the core question is whether the legislature intended that the word “costs” in § 218.01(9)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24877 - 2017-09-21
Ruth H. Laho v. Century 21 Baltes-Selsberg
. The first clause is from the “definitions” section of Continental's policy; it states that the words “you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9295 - 2005-03-31
. The first clause is from the “definitions” section of Continental's policy; it states that the words “you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9295 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian K. Rice
reasons for doing so on the record. (Emphasis added.) The statute uses the word “may,” not “shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6423 - 2005-03-31
reasons for doing so on the record. (Emphasis added.) The statute uses the word “may,” not “shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6423 - 2005-03-31
Melanie Bauer v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.
interpreting the word “resident” are relevant to our interpretation of this phrase. She relies on several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25717 - 2006-07-25
interpreting the word “resident” are relevant to our interpretation of this phrase. She relies on several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25717 - 2006-07-25
State v. Donna E. Howard-Hastings
meaning of a statute is unambiguous, the words of the statute must be given their obvious and intended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13132 - 2005-03-31
meaning of a statute is unambiguous, the words of the statute must be given their obvious and intended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13132 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph E. Heifort
that was actually given. ¶6 In Heifort’s case, the jury was given no definition of the word “lewd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6878 - 2005-03-31
that was actually given. ¶6 In Heifort’s case, the jury was given no definition of the word “lewd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6878 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ruth H. Laho v. Century 21 Baltes-Selsberg
. The first clause is from the “definitions” section of Continental's policy; it states that the words “you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9295 - 2017-09-19
. The first clause is from the “definitions” section of Continental's policy; it states that the words “you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9295 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jane Drangstviet v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
., 111 Wis.2d 584, 331 N.W.2d 598 (Ct. App. 1983), for the proposition that the word "occupied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8477 - 2017-09-19
., 111 Wis.2d 584, 331 N.W.2d 598 (Ct. App. 1983), for the proposition that the word "occupied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8477 - 2017-09-19