Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9701 - 9710 of 59386 for quit claim deed.
Search results 9701 - 9710 of 59386 for quit claim deed.
COURT OF APPEALS
-assistance claims against the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee.[1] See Wis. Stat. § 32.19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29256 - 2007-06-04
-assistance claims against the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee.[1] See Wis. Stat. § 32.19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29256 - 2007-06-04
William J. Marth v. Robert Jahn
and awarding actual attorney’s fees pursuant to § 814.025, Stats., the frivolous claims statute. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14934 - 2005-03-31
and awarding actual attorney’s fees pursuant to § 814.025, Stats., the frivolous claims statute. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14934 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
William J. Evers v. John A. Hager
his claims against John Hager and Sherry Hager. Evers argues that the trial court erroneously (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9687 - 2017-09-19
his claims against John Hager and Sherry Hager. Evers argues that the trial court erroneously (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9687 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
specific weeks in which she filed unemployment benefit claims and determined that she must therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28660 - 2014-09-15
specific weeks in which she filed unemployment benefit claims and determined that she must therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28660 - 2014-09-15
John A. Zulliger v. Town of Harding
a highway is barred by Wis. Stat. § 80.34(2), we affirm. We also affirm the dismissal of the tort claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2482 - 2005-03-31
a highway is barred by Wis. Stat. § 80.34(2), we affirm. We also affirm the dismissal of the tort claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2482 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an order which dismissed his counterclaim against Nelson & Sons Painting (Nelson) in this small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30543 - 2007-10-09
an order which dismissed his counterclaim against Nelson & Sons Painting (Nelson) in this small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30543 - 2007-10-09
The Estate of Frank P. Rille v. Physicians Insurance Company
to the tort action, but not against the litigant, when the litigant seeks to preserve a potential claim
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24814 - 2006-04-18
to the tort action, but not against the litigant, when the litigant seeks to preserve a potential claim
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24814 - 2006-04-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denied. The State argues that the circuit court correctly concluded that Flores’s claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177080 - 2017-09-21
denied. The State argues that the circuit court correctly concluded that Flores’s claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177080 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a sufficient reason for failing to make his current claims in his previous no-merit appeal, he is barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197488 - 2017-10-10
a sufficient reason for failing to make his current claims in his previous no-merit appeal, he is barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197488 - 2017-10-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
to consider his claimed mental disabilities at sentencing, he should be resentenced. ¶6 We first examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28153 - 2014-09-15
to consider his claimed mental disabilities at sentencing, he should be resentenced. ¶6 We first examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28153 - 2014-09-15