Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9711 - 9720 of 74479 for public records.
Search results 9711 - 9720 of 74479 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit reports and response, and following an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023134 - 2025-10-14
consideration of the no-merit reports and response, and following an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023134 - 2025-10-14
[PDF]
State v. Anthony S.
, the court held that it was not in the best interest of the juvenile or the public that the court retain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15546 - 2017-09-21
, the court held that it was not in the best interest of the juvenile or the public that the court retain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15546 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to a gun shop. Video surveillance equipment in the shop recorded Flores handling guns. Flores left
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84631 - 2012-07-09
to a gun shop. Video surveillance equipment in the shop recorded Flores handling guns. Flores left
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84631 - 2012-07-09
[PDF]
State v. Kinte Scott
. 4 The record does not explain what a “warrant recommendation” is. We assume it means a request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16271 - 2017-09-21
. 4 The record does not explain what a “warrant recommendation” is. We assume it means a request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16271 - 2017-09-21
State v. Anthony S.
that it was not in the best interest of the juvenile or the public that the court retain juvenile jurisdiction. Anthony’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15546 - 2005-03-31
that it was not in the best interest of the juvenile or the public that the court retain juvenile jurisdiction. Anthony’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15546 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit reports and response, and following an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023134 - 2025-10-14
consideration of the no-merit reports and response, and following an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023134 - 2025-10-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the opportunity to speak off the record to a representative of the public defender’s office, and set a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74595 - 2014-09-15
the opportunity to speak off the record to a representative of the public defender’s office, and set a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74595 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
record upon which to decide them, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On June 27, 2013, the Manchester
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130922 - 2014-12-01
record upon which to decide them, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On June 27, 2013, the Manchester
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130922 - 2014-12-01
[PDF]
WI APP 5
of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Steven D. Phillips, assistant state public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35025 - 2014-09-15
of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Steven D. Phillips, assistant state public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35025 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kinte Scott
be said is that Stevens initially received a dispatch of “shots fired.” But the record does not reveal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16271 - 2005-03-31
be said is that Stevens initially received a dispatch of “shots fired.” But the record does not reveal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16271 - 2005-03-31