Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9721 - 9730 of 15298 for mark's.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that the misinformation formed part of the basis for the sentence.” (internal quotation marks and quoted source omitted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=340180 - 2021-02-25

COURT OF APPEALS
that she would “mark it disputed” but that collection efforts would continue until Andersen proved he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87122 - 2012-09-18

State v. Todd R. Gilbertson
By affidavit dated July 21, 1994, Monroe Police Officer Mark Samelstad requested a warrant to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10480 - 2005-06-18

COURT OF APPEALS
enough to be probative.’” (One set of quotation marks and citation omitted.) Significantly, as before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74181 - 2011-11-21

COURT OF APPEALS
the authorization as a marked exhibit and accepted it “as a genuine document issued by Dr. Ironside.” Kettner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49183 - 2010-04-19

City of Green Bay v. Donald J. Schleis
” includes the following: “marked by absence of an intervening agency, instrumentality, or influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16135 - 2005-03-31

WI App 44 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP958-CR Complete Titl...
relinquishment or abandonment of a known right.”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46888 - 2009-12-09

Mutual Service Insurance Companies v. Brian Betterley
or wholly on the shoulder of the highway.[2] Tire tracks, skid marks, and other physical evidence did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7307 - 2005-03-31

Wayne F. Schrubbe v. Peninsula Veterinary Service, Inc.
-respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of Mark A. Pennow and Beth Rahmig Pless of Denissen, Kranzush
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9893 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of the double jeopardy inhibition.’” Id. at 709-10 (citation, brackets, and one set of quotation marks omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140081 - 2015-04-20