Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9751 - 9760 of 73682 for has.
Search results 9751 - 9760 of 73682 for has.
COURT OF APPEALS
has to show that her trial counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial. Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104715 - 2013-11-26
has to show that her trial counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial. Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104715 - 2013-11-26
State v. John S. Bergmann
is presumed to have acted reasonably and the defendant has the burden to show unreasonableness from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14344 - 2005-03-31
is presumed to have acted reasonably and the defendant has the burden to show unreasonableness from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14344 - 2005-03-31
State v. John H. Maclin
that under State v. Ziegler, 2005 WI App 69, 695 N.W.2d 895, Maclin has failed to demonstrate he has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19379 - 2005-08-22
that under State v. Ziegler, 2005 WI App 69, 695 N.W.2d 895, Maclin has failed to demonstrate he has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19379 - 2005-08-22
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2012AP2458-NM
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92926 - 2014-09-15
are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2012AP2458-NM
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92926 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
Attorney General P. O. Box 7857 Madison, WI 53707-7857 You are hereby notified that the Court has entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105738 - 2013-12-17
Attorney General P. O. Box 7857 Madison, WI 53707-7857 You are hereby notified that the Court has entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105738 - 2013-12-17
COURT OF APPEALS
proof to determine whether the moving party has established a case for judgment. Id. If the moving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32538 - 2008-04-28
proof to determine whether the moving party has established a case for judgment. Id. If the moving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32538 - 2008-04-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2020AP556 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=392940 - 2021-07-21
are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2020AP556 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=392940 - 2021-07-21
Thomas G. v. Michael R.
(1987). We first examine “the moving papers and documents to determine whether the moving party has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5521 - 2005-03-31
(1987). We first examine “the moving papers and documents to determine whether the moving party has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5521 - 2005-03-31
Malcolm, Inc. v. Eau Claire County Board of Land Use Appeals
, 247 N.W.2d 98 (1976) (citations omitted)). Whether the standard has been met is based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19364 - 2005-08-22
, 247 N.W.2d 98 (1976) (citations omitted)). Whether the standard has been met is based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19364 - 2005-08-22
State v. Charles V. Royster
advantage the trial court has in considering the relevant factors and the demeanor of the defendant. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24971 - 2006-05-01
advantage the trial court has in considering the relevant factors and the demeanor of the defendant. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24971 - 2006-05-01