Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9761 - 9770 of 16399 for commentating.

Chris Gentilli v. The Board of Police and Fire Commissioners of the City of Madison
testimony about Amesqua’s comments regarding parameters for “damage control” for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25062 - 2006-05-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
-examination. II. Improper Closing Argument ¶33 Kudek next challenges certain comments the prosecutor made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=481891 - 2022-02-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are entitled to a wide latitude in arguments and comments on the evidence.” It explained that heroin use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=614483 - 2023-01-25

[PDF]
247 (Ct. App. 1999) (comments by an attorney that informed the jury of the effect of its answers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=784420 - 2024-04-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that it is improper for a victim to comment at sentencing on his or her belief regarding a defendant’s level
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563254 - 2022-09-07

[PDF] Joni B. v. State
(legislative); and Art. VII, secs. 2, 3 and 4 (judicial). 5 This court has previously commented
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17063 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 17, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
not object when the prosecutor made allegedly improper comments during closing arguments. Lee does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27779 - 2007-01-16

COURT OF APPEALS
assertion about the prosecutor’s comment in closing argument on defense counsel’s limited questioning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32568 - 2008-04-30

[PDF] Heather A. Rippl v. Board of Bar Examiners
. Rippl explains that she intended that comment as a "sarcastic, off-the-cuff remark . . . meant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16429 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Thomas R. Volden v. OKK Corporation
to the 10 The trial court commented that Waber’s testimony “was really res ipsa type of argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2703 - 2017-09-19