Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9771 - 9780 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 9771 - 9780 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Richard E. Ziltener
a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Patients Comp. Fund v. Lutheran Hosp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13849 - 2014-09-15
a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Patients Comp. Fund v. Lutheran Hosp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13849 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Doral Williams
). Whether a counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10341 - 2017-09-20
). Whether a counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10341 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Nicholas S. Cole
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25414 - 2017-09-21
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25414 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decides de novo. See id. DISCUSSION ¶12 A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel has two parts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81209 - 2014-09-15
decides de novo. See id. DISCUSSION ¶12 A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel has two parts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81209 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mary Messer v. Lynn T. Martin, M.D.
the fainting episode in the elevator. DISCUSSION ¶5 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7268 - 2017-09-20
the fainting episode in the elevator. DISCUSSION ¶5 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7268 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
which we review de novo.” Id. If a modification of child support is warranted, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105211 - 2017-09-21
which we review de novo.” Id. If a modification of child support is warranted, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105211 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Douglas County Department of Human Services v. Susan L.
that presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 87, 414 N.W.2d 311
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12881 - 2017-09-21
that presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 87, 414 N.W.2d 311
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12881 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Lee, 2008 WI App 185, ¶7, 314 Wis. 2d 764, 762 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206092 - 2017-12-27
a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Lee, 2008 WI App 185, ¶7, 314 Wis. 2d 764, 762 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206092 - 2017-12-27
[PDF]
Ellen Wall Payne v. Phillip Charles Brande
properly exercised jurisdiction under § 822.03 is a question of law, subject to de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13947 - 2014-09-15
properly exercised jurisdiction under § 822.03 is a question of law, subject to de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13947 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
such questions de novo. See State v. Ploeckelman, 2007 WI App 31, ¶8, 299 Wis. 2d 251, 729 N.W.2d 784. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230947 - 2018-12-26
such questions de novo. See State v. Ploeckelman, 2007 WI App 31, ¶8, 299 Wis. 2d 251, 729 N.W.2d 784. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230947 - 2018-12-26