Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9771 - 9780 of 63956 for records.
Search results 9771 - 9780 of 63956 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
enhancements.1 Payne has responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254093 - 2020-02-18
enhancements.1 Payne has responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254093 - 2020-02-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, recorded two mortgages. The first, dated November 11, 1987, was from David to Marcella and secured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102087 - 2017-09-21
, recorded two mortgages. The first, dated November 11, 1987, was from David to Marcella and secured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102087 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Eric W. Kruger v. Christina L. Kruger
to the marriage. The record indicates that she produced a highly detailed list of household goods and furniture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16296 - 2017-09-21
to the marriage. The record indicates that she produced a highly detailed list of household goods and furniture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16296 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
William Charles Sharp v. Thomas M. Hughes
a judgment and an order declaring that Thomas and Tammy Hughes have record title to a strip of land west
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18163 - 2017-09-21
a judgment and an order declaring that Thomas and Tammy Hughes have record title to a strip of land west
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18163 - 2017-09-21
James T. Fritz v. Mary D. Fritz
not have been relied on by the court because the court did not examine him on the record about whether he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13692 - 2005-03-31
not have been relied on by the court because the court did not examine him on the record about whether he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13692 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harold Richard Nero
of twenty-two years and nine months. However, he argues that the trial court did not “state for the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7579 - 2005-03-31
of twenty-two years and nine months. However, he argues that the trial court did not “state for the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7579 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“did bring these issues up before trial,” but our review of the record suggests that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550992 - 2022-08-02
“did bring these issues up before trial,” but our review of the record suggests that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550992 - 2022-08-02
State v. Harold Richard Nero
of twenty-two years and nine months. However, he argues that the trial court did not “state for the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7578 - 2005-03-31
of twenty-two years and nine months. However, he argues that the trial court did not “state for the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7578 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harold Richard Nero
of twenty-two years and nine months. However, he argues that the trial court did not “state for the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7576 - 2005-03-31
of twenty-two years and nine months. However, he argues that the trial court did not “state for the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7576 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harold Richard Nero
of twenty-two years and nine months. However, he argues that the trial court did not “state for the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7575 - 2005-03-31
of twenty-two years and nine months. However, he argues that the trial court did not “state for the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7575 - 2005-03-31