Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9771 - 9780 of 12873 for se.
Search results 9771 - 9780 of 12873 for se.
[PDF]
State v. Jennifer K. Matejka
Amendments, a search conducted without a warrant issued upon probable cause is “per se unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14973 - 2017-09-21
Amendments, a search conducted without a warrant issued upon probable cause is “per se unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14973 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
two pro se postconviction motions that are not at issue on appeal and will not be discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58298 - 2014-09-15
two pro se postconviction motions that are not at issue on appeal and will not be discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58298 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Eric Pittman
. Before Nettesheim, Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Eric Pittman has appealed pro se from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13994 - 2014-09-15
. Before Nettesheim, Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Eric Pittman has appealed pro se from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13994 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion, does not desire to proceed pro se, and refuses to consent to counsel closing the file without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168284 - 2017-09-21
motion, does not desire to proceed pro se, and refuses to consent to counsel closing the file without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168284 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 GROGAN, J.1 Stephen Lodwick appeals, pro se, from two orders, one of which denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011081 - 2025-09-17
. ¶1 GROGAN, J.1 Stephen Lodwick appeals, pro se, from two orders, one of which denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011081 - 2025-09-17
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶5 A trial on the matter was held on September 30, 2009. Schultz appeared pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53541 - 2010-08-24
. ¶5 A trial on the matter was held on September 30, 2009. Schultz appeared pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53541 - 2010-08-24
Certification
. Furthermore, it would seem that such a per se rule would be inconsistent with the usual method of reviewing
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29495 - 2007-06-27
. Furthermore, it would seem that such a per se rule would be inconsistent with the usual method of reviewing
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29495 - 2007-06-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
, ¶42. Late notice is not prejudicial per se, “but the risk of nonpersuasion is upon the person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48122 - 2014-09-15
, ¶42. Late notice is not prejudicial per se, “but the risk of nonpersuasion is upon the person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48122 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mary C. Pentinmaki v. Oliver A. Pentinmaki, Jr.
), STATS. This means that the guardian ad litem does not represent a child per se but represents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9059 - 2017-09-19
), STATS. This means that the guardian ad litem does not represent a child per se but represents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9059 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2017AP2396 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Terry Carpenter, pro se, appeals the property division portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247761 - 2019-10-01
). No. 2017AP2396 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Terry Carpenter, pro se, appeals the property division portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247761 - 2019-10-01