Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9781 - 9790 of 98528 for court records search online.
Search results 9781 - 9790 of 98528 for court records search online.
State v. David R. Melstrand
to determine whether the search was lawful. Id. ¶10 The trial court found that Melstrand consented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4345 - 2005-03-31
to determine whether the search was lawful. Id. ¶10 The trial court found that Melstrand consented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4345 - 2005-03-31
County of Vilas v. David R. Melstrand
to determine whether the search was lawful. Id. ¶10 The trial court found that Melstrand consented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4346 - 2005-03-31
to determine whether the search was lawful. Id. ¶10 The trial court found that Melstrand consented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4346 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Vilas v. David R. Melstrand
that Melstrand consented to the search and Poupart did not exceed the scope of the consent. The court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4347 - 2017-09-19
that Melstrand consented to the search and Poupart did not exceed the scope of the consent. The court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4347 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
County of Vilas v. David R. Melstrand
that Melstrand consented to the search and Poupart did not exceed the scope of the consent. The court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4346 - 2017-09-19
that Melstrand consented to the search and Poupart did not exceed the scope of the consent. The court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4346 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 318 (1968), and “we may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54380 - 2010-09-13
.2d 318 (1968), and “we may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54380 - 2010-09-13
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 1, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109790 - 2014-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 1, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109790 - 2014-03-31
State v. Lynette K. Felber
in the application for the search warrant. The court denied the motion, finding that Felber could not benefit from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9433 - 2005-03-31
in the application for the search warrant. The court denied the motion, finding that Felber could not benefit from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9433 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lynette K. Felber
attributed to the informant in the application for the search warrant. The court denied the motion, finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9433 - 2017-09-19
attributed to the informant in the application for the search warrant. The court denied the motion, finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9433 - 2017-09-19
State v. Scott A. Clemons
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 5, 2003 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5571 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 5, 2003 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5571 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Scott A. Clemons
the search. The suppression motion was properly denied. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5571 - 2017-09-19
the search. The suppression motion was properly denied. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5571 - 2017-09-19