Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9781 - 9790 of 72902 for we.

Lieutenant Garilyn Truttschel v. Police Chief Hugh Martin
not commence a statutory review. Because we conclude that Truttschel followed the directive of § 62.13(5)(i
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11184 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the order dismissing his complaint. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622415 - 2023-02-16

COURT OF APPEALS
for filing a frivolous appeal. We agree the present claims are procedurally barred, but decline to impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31175 - 2007-12-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance of trial counsel on several grounds. ¶2 We conclude that the circuit court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92069 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
in awarding attorney fees. We disagree, and affirm. Background ¶2 Larry and Kayleen married
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73769 - 2011-11-16

State v. Michael B. Ilkka
for a misdemeanor traffic offense. We affirm. ¶2 The facts, while unusual, may be briefly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16175 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
”), and for reconsideration. We affirm, as Kobilka’s challenges were not properly before the circuit court. Pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216470 - 2018-07-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
the statutory maximum. Because we conclude that Newson is entitled to an evidentiary hearing and opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28362 - 2007-03-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment to GreenStone. For the following reasons, we reverse the circuit court’s grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132739 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] County of Clark v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
to misconduct. We agree. We therefore reverse and remand with directions to reinstate benefits. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13631 - 2017-09-21