Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9791 - 9800 of 18661 for quote.
Search results 9791 - 9800 of 18661 for quote.
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Phinisee
.12, 217 N.W.2d 657, 662 n.12 (1974) (quoting Baker v. United States, 401 F.2d 958, 977 (D.C. Cir
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12066 - 2017-09-21
.12, 217 N.W.2d 657, 662 n.12 (1974) (quoting Baker v. United States, 401 F.2d 958, 977 (D.C. Cir
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12066 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
‘in an exceptional case.’” Id. (quoting WIS. STAT. § 19.31). Thus, “we begin with the strong presumption favoring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771185 - 2024-03-05
‘in an exceptional case.’” Id. (quoting WIS. STAT. § 19.31). Thus, “we begin with the strong presumption favoring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771185 - 2024-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
.’” State v. Thiel¸ 2003 WI 111, ¶20, 264 Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305 (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39904 - 2009-08-25
.’” State v. Thiel¸ 2003 WI 111, ¶20, 264 Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305 (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39904 - 2009-08-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and that the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant. Savage, 395 Wis. 2d 1, ¶27 (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767300 - 2024-02-28
and that the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant. Savage, 395 Wis. 2d 1, ¶27 (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767300 - 2024-02-28
State v. Lawrence P. Hoffman
is in danger; 3. rescue as the primary purpose and motive of the interrogators.” Id. (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4483 - 2005-03-31
is in danger; 3. rescue as the primary purpose and motive of the interrogators.” Id. (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4483 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 336, ¶9 (quoting Head, 255 Wis. 2d 194, ¶113). ¶12 We conclude Kuykendall failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96321 - 2014-09-15
Wis. 2d 336, ¶9 (quoting Head, 255 Wis. 2d 194, ¶113). ¶12 We conclude Kuykendall failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96321 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
640, 667, 581 N.W.2d 567 (Ct. App. 1998) (quoting State v. Hicks, 202 Wis. 2d 150, 160, 549 N.W.2d 435
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52020 - 2010-07-14
640, 667, 581 N.W.2d 567 (Ct. App. 1998) (quoting State v. Hicks, 202 Wis. 2d 150, 160, 549 N.W.2d 435
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52020 - 2010-07-14
Chuck Meseck v. David Larsen
491, 506, 493 N.W.2d 758, 765 (Ct. App. 1992) (quoting State v. American TV & Appliance of Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14639 - 2005-03-31
491, 506, 493 N.W.2d 758, 765 (Ct. App. 1992) (quoting State v. American TV & Appliance of Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14639 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James R. Schultz v. Gerald Berge
for the protection of the public health, safety, or general welfare.”’” (Quoted sources omitted.) In WestGate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11567 - 2017-09-19
for the protection of the public health, safety, or general welfare.”’” (Quoted sources omitted.) In WestGate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11567 - 2017-09-19
State v. Melvin E. Vance
(quoting 7 Blinka, § 609.1, at 417-18). Additionally, in closing arguments, Vance argued White
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7026 - 2005-03-31
(quoting 7 Blinka, § 609.1, at 417-18). Additionally, in closing arguments, Vance argued White
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7026 - 2005-03-31