Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9791 - 9800 of 63537 for records.
Search results 9791 - 9800 of 63537 for records.
Mark Garber v. Fidelis Omegbu
, Omegbu moved to supplement the appellate record to include the file for case 02CM2619. Garber objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25630 - 2006-06-26
, Omegbu moved to supplement the appellate record to include the file for case 02CM2619. Garber objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25630 - 2006-06-26
State v. Stephen R. Hart
testimony that Hart suffered from sleep apnea thereby preventing him from presenting a defense; (3) records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8129 - 2005-03-31
testimony that Hart suffered from sleep apnea thereby preventing him from presenting a defense; (3) records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8129 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Julie Ann Quinn
determination ... if the record shows that discretion was ... exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13629 - 2017-09-21
determination ... if the record shows that discretion was ... exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13629 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052508 - 2025-12-18
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052508 - 2025-12-18
Rock County DHS v. Jessica L.
without first finding that her conduct was egregious or in bad faith.[2] We conclude the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20154 - 2005-11-01
without first finding that her conduct was egregious or in bad faith.[2] We conclude the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20154 - 2005-11-01
State v. Antonio L. Simmons
allegations; or (3) the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6540 - 2005-03-31
allegations; or (3) the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6540 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel has filed a supplemental no-merit report. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050940 - 2025-12-16
counsel has filed a supplemental no-merit report. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050940 - 2025-12-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052508 - 2025-12-18
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052508 - 2025-12-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no-merit report, and we have independently reviewed the consolidated records. We conclude that further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207264 - 2018-01-17
no-merit report, and we have independently reviewed the consolidated records. We conclude that further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207264 - 2018-01-17
State v. Antonio L. Simmons
allegations; or (3) the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6541 - 2005-03-31
allegations; or (3) the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6541 - 2005-03-31