Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 981 - 990 of 20925 for word.

State v. Joseph E. Heifort
that was actually given. ¶6 In Heifort’s case, the jury was given no definition of the word “lewd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6878 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Ruth H. Laho v. Century 21 Baltes-Selsberg
. The first clause is from the “definitions” section of Continental's policy; it states that the words “you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9295 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Tammy Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.
). Thus, the core question is whether the legislature intended that the word “costs” in § 218.01(9)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24877 - 2017-09-21

WI App 112 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2566 Complete Title o...
with the language of § 102.57, giving the words employed by the legislature their common, ordinary, and accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100211 - 2013-09-24

COURT OF APPEALS
it to her word for word” and evidently understood it because she made a correction. These findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51363 - 2010-06-29

[PDF] Timothy J. Kopke v. A. Hartrodt S.R.L.
." as it is abbreviated, is an Italian word meaning "container" and "X" is an abbreviation for "per," meaning
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17575 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
the words employed in the statute, but also from the context. 8 Id., ¶46. We interpret statutory
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168034 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Robert W. Sweat
. 2d 650, 662, 539 N.W.2d 98 (1995). Ambiguity can be found in the words of the statutory
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17038 - 2017-09-21

Columbus Park Housing Corporation v. City of Kenosha
words and phrases shall be given their ordinary and accepted meaning but technical words shall be given
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16604 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert W. Sweat
650, 662, 539 N.W.2d 98 (1995). Ambiguity can be found in the words of the statutory provision itself
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17038 - 2005-03-31