Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9801 - 9810 of 98528 for court records search online.
Search results 9801 - 9810 of 98528 for court records search online.
[PDF]
Otto Mogged v. Margaret A. Mogged
. 2 The record indicates that the trial court issued a memorandum decision in December 1993 setting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15107 - 2017-09-21
. 2 The record indicates that the trial court issued a memorandum decision in December 1993 setting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15107 - 2017-09-21
Otto Mogged v. Margaret A. Mogged
. The record reflects that Margaret’s attorney, Tim Osicka, had written the trial court requesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15107 - 2005-03-31
. The record reflects that Margaret’s attorney, Tim Osicka, had written the trial court requesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15107 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
22-03 - Comments from American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Wisconsin
, Inc. to amend the retention rules for eviction records to allow courts to purge those eviction cases
/supreme/docs/2203_aclucomments.pdf - 2022-08-30
, Inc. to amend the retention rules for eviction records to allow courts to purge those eviction cases
/supreme/docs/2203_aclucomments.pdf - 2022-08-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the grounds that the search was unlawful. Because the trial court erred in taking judicial notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33791 - 2014-09-15
on the grounds that the search was unlawful. Because the trial court erred in taking judicial notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33791 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 4, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71744 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 4, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71744 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a search. We affirm the circuit court’s denial of the motion to suppress evidence and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82117 - 2014-09-15
to a search. We affirm the circuit court’s denial of the motion to suppress evidence and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82117 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the record, the inconvenience to the parties, the witnesses, and the court are what one would expect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177979 - 2017-09-21
to the record, the inconvenience to the parties, the witnesses, and the court are what one would expect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177979 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
681. ¶32 On review, this court “must examine the record to find facts that support upholding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188272 - 2017-09-21
681. ¶32 On review, this court “must examine the record to find facts that support upholding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188272 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court addressed the scope of the search made pursuant to consent to search given after the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93175 - 2014-09-15
. The court addressed the scope of the search made pursuant to consent to search given after the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93175 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, 182 N.W.2d at 522 (reviewing court must “search the record to determine whether in the exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101726 - 2013-09-09
, 182 N.W.2d at 522 (reviewing court must “search the record to determine whether in the exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101726 - 2013-09-09