Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9801 - 9810 of 76985 for search which.
Search results 9801 - 9810 of 76985 for search which.
COURT OF APPEALS
Constitution and the Wisconsin Constitution prohibit unreasonable searches and seizures. U.S. Const. amend. IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47834 - 2010-03-10
Constitution and the Wisconsin Constitution prohibit unreasonable searches and seizures. U.S. Const. amend. IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47834 - 2010-03-10
State v. Michael D. Drescher
testified that Drescher approached his vehicle and the officer ordered Drescher to return to his car, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20082 - 2007-06-04
testified that Drescher approached his vehicle and the officer ordered Drescher to return to his car, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20082 - 2007-06-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
Constitution and the Wisconsin Constitution prohibit unreasonable searches and seizures. U.S. CONST. amend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47834 - 2014-09-15
Constitution and the Wisconsin Constitution prohibit unreasonable searches and seizures. U.S. CONST. amend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47834 - 2014-09-15
State v. Steve A. Johnson
was speeding and so he pursued Johnson. Johnson next made a right turn, after which he was again observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13029 - 2005-03-31
was speeding and so he pursued Johnson. Johnson next made a right turn, after which he was again observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13029 - 2005-03-31
County of Winnebago v. David M. Meza
protect an individual’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. See U.S. Const. amend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2538 - 2005-03-31
protect an individual’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. See U.S. Const. amend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2538 - 2005-03-31
State v. David M. Meza
protect an individual’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. See U.S. Const. amend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2537 - 2005-03-31
protect an individual’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. See U.S. Const. amend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2537 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
than sufficient facts from which the officer could infer that Bingham “operated” the vehicle. The law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44277 - 2009-12-09
than sufficient facts from which the officer could infer that Bingham “operated” the vehicle. The law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44277 - 2009-12-09
State v. Rose Marie Hartfield
a postconviction motion in which she argued that the circuit court at sentencing had provided primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25063 - 2006-05-08
a postconviction motion in which she argued that the circuit court at sentencing had provided primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25063 - 2006-05-08
[PDF]
State v. Steven Schelk
searched Schelk and discovered what appeared to be cocaine in the pocket of his pants. Schelk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13485 - 2017-09-21
searched Schelk and discovered what appeared to be cocaine in the pocket of his pants. Schelk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13485 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert G. Busch
. The officer followed a vehicle, which turned off the highway and eventually pulled into the driveway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12601 - 2005-03-31
. The officer followed a vehicle, which turned off the highway and eventually pulled into the driveway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12601 - 2005-03-31