Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9801 - 9810 of 84321 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 9801 - 9810 of 84321 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
violated ordinance § 7.01(8), and under “Description of Violation” it stated, “[F]ailure to allow search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59760 - 2014-09-15
violated ordinance § 7.01(8), and under “Description of Violation” it stated, “[F]ailure to allow search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59760 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
force during the execution of a search warrant for an involuntary blood draw. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=359468 - 2021-04-27
force during the execution of a search warrant for an involuntary blood draw. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=359468 - 2021-04-27
Frontsheet
2010 WI 112 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2010AP1118-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54224 - 2010-09-07
2010 WI 112 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2010AP1118-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54224 - 2010-09-07
[PDF]
State v. Jacob W. Hatcher
. Background ¶2 The facts of this case are undisputed. At 11:59 p.m. on June 26, 2001, officer Chris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5746 - 2017-09-19
. Background ¶2 The facts of this case are undisputed. At 11:59 p.m. on June 26, 2001, officer Chris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5746 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief. We agree with the State that the police search of Werdin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64079 - 2011-05-17
denying his motion for postconviction relief. We agree with the State that the police search of Werdin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64079 - 2011-05-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the police search of Werdin’s computer was lawful because regardless of whether his estranged wife had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64079 - 2014-09-15
that the police search of Werdin’s computer was lawful because regardless of whether his estranged wife had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64079 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
consistent with, in their experience, drug trafficking near a residence for which they had obtained a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30155 - 2007-09-04
consistent with, in their experience, drug trafficking near a residence for which they had obtained a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30155 - 2007-09-04
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Response Brief of Nathan Atkinson, Stephen Joseph Wright, Gary Krenz, Sarah J. Hamilton, Jean-Luc Thiffeault, Somesh Jha, Joanne Kane, and Leah Dudley
10-30-2023 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 Response Brief of Nathan Atkinson
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1030responsebriefatkinson.pdf - 2023-10-30
10-30-2023 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 Response Brief of Nathan Atkinson
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1030responsebriefatkinson.pdf - 2023-10-30
COURT OF APPEALS
search; (2) the trial court violated his Fifth Amendment rights when it failed to charge him by grand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30297 - 2007-09-17
search; (2) the trial court violated his Fifth Amendment rights when it failed to charge him by grand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30297 - 2007-09-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
pretrial motion to suppress evidence gathered in a warrantless search; (2) the trial court violated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30297 - 2014-09-15
pretrial motion to suppress evidence gathered in a warrantless search; (2) the trial court violated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30297 - 2014-09-15