Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9811 - 9820 of 18305 for re.

State v. Daniel Mahnke
to exclude. See In re Michael R. B., 175 Wis.2d 713, 727, 499 N.W.2d 641, 647 (1993) (the law protects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8557 - 2005-03-31

Elizabeth Tooke v. Robert Tooke
IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: ELIZABETH TOOKE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8955 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
received ineffective assistance of counsel.[2] ¶8 To the extent Carter re-argues matters already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53196 - 2010-08-09

[PDF] Rosemarie Pitz v. Bernard Pitz
DISTRICT II IN RE THE ESTATE OF CECELIA G. PITZ, DECEASED: ROSEMARIE PITZ AND KATHLEEN PITZ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14625 - 2017-09-21

State v. Albin E. Bartosz
. In re J.V.R., 127 Wis.2d 192, 199, 378 N.W.2d 266, 269 (1985). The purpose of statutory interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8294 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael D. Drescher
In re the Matter of the Refusal of Michael D. Drescher: State of Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20082 - 2007-06-04

[PDF] CA Blank Order
has entered the following opinion and order: 2023AP798 In re the termination of parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=720422 - 2023-10-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
opinion and order: 2022AP1732 In re the marriage of: Jacqueline M. Randa v. Russell Scott
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713964 - 2023-10-18

State v. April J. Ingalls
have reached. In re Estate of Dejmal, 95 Wis. 2d 141, 154, 289 N.W.2d 813 (1980). Appellate court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3865 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
understanding of the victim’s testimony. ¶9 Similarly, the victim’s answers on re-direct examination lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110427 - 2014-04-16